@scarab: it's unbiased because there's no information behind their opinions. They're just rewriting stuff they've heard on teh intarwebz. I want opinion that has...an opinion. This site could be awesome, it's backed by freaking AOL. It's not some scrub in his mom's house covering E3 from Podunk Ohio. It's a staff of paid professionals who haven't got a clue what they're doing.

I enjoy reading these articles, but I will say that this sentence disturbs me every time I see it or something like it: "Nintendo's 2008 catalog will be filled with games that appeal to kids, women, older people, and pretty much any one but gamers that were raised on Nintendo." I can understand older people not being core gamers for the most part. I can understand grouping kids in there -- especially little kids (though Nintendo has been marketing to kids for a long time). What I can't tolerate is throwing "women" in there. There are plenty of women who are core gamers. None of us really appreciate being left out of the "core" category and expected to play games like "cooking mama" and "nintendogs". To be more specific, you could say "women who don't usually play games" or something like that, but don't just say women in general, because it's just not true.

this game is the *****ing mother bord so get it right co ck

COD 5 is World at War. They asked for some one wih history of milatry in there ads and annoucned it as the 5th. but activision an infinity ward switch off between games. ACDCmaniac lies

if u really have to complain about what u read in the article, then you should just gtfo rather than picking apart what they put here. Personally I thought it was nice to read an unbiased gaming article.